ACC says no ‘policy corruption’ in Trowa but points out scathing administrative and procedural lapses

tsheringtobgayThe Anti Corruption Commission in its review of the Trowa Theater case has said that the commission did not find it appropriate to investigate it as a corruption case as corrupt intention cannot be established.

The ACC has, however, pointed out a litany of administrative and procedural lapses and weaknesses in the Trowa case.

The ACC’s review report says, “The Ministry as the competent authority on matters under its mandate may not have exhausted all administrative procedures. As an example, though so much time has passed, even a notice was not served to the owner of the Trowa Theater on suspension of business pending the resolution of the problem. While lease rent was pending business continued as usual.”

It says that similarly many administrative lapses have occurred in lease policy and planning, lease preparation, lease monitoring during implementation and lease administration from 2001 till date.

The ACC said that administrative liability and accountability needs to be fixed on officials involved.

It was pointed out that though the National Assembly had directed the Ministry to take up the matter legally the Ministry did not take the legal option forward. Instead, as one of the options, the Ministry requested the National Land Commission to approve the sale of land at a mutually negotiated price.

The report says, “This letter to the NLC sparked the notion that attempt was made to sell Trowa theater land through policy corruption. In this particular case, the Minister who proposed the sale of land inherited the problem from the predecessor.”

The ACC had met with the Royal Audit Authority who had initially pointed out the Trowa case while reviewing the Trowa case.

The ACC criticized the Ministry’s options to the RAA to solve the problems in 2012 which included selling the land to the owner, buying back the property or lowering the lease rate.

The report said, “The four option proposed above had conditions which seem more difficult to meet than resolve the stalemate. This reflects either the commitment to solve the problem or the shear desperate attempt to pass the problems to others.”

It also says that in 2001 when Trowa was first leased there were no clear policy guidelines or rules and regulations on lease of government land. Lease of land took place on ad-hoc basis without a standard procedure. ‘Devoid of standard procedure, due diligence in protecting government interest was not exercised. How can one justify a lease period of 25 years and allow construction of a permanent recreational facility with minimum terms and conditions governing it,’ says the report.

The ACC pointed out contradictory clauses in the lease and also government rules.

The ACC in an indirect reference to the Education City project among others said, “The continuing sad story is that more Trowa theatre like cases are being created with lease of government land with a maximum lease period of 30 years. Any land lease deal with a permanent structure on it that would outlive 30 years would be on potential problem. At the end of the of the lease period, a permanent structure would be on government land. How would we deal with this typically Trowa Theater like stalemate?”

The report said that more such problems are being created every day. It says, “While short term land lease with temporary structures would be much easier to deal with, lack of clear rules, involvement of multiple agencies, lack of central database etc make land lease highly vulnerable to corruption.”

The ACC said that while how to resolve the stalemate of Trowa Theater Land Lease Case is an administrative matter, there is definitely a strong need to improve the government land lease system.

It says, “The system review needs to come out with a comprehensive policy, supported by rules and regulations in line with the Land Act 2007. A central database of information on land lease along with agency level information being maintained at agencies in a two tier information database system needs to be developed as the minimum requirement of check and balance.”

The 19432.56 square foot (sft) land at Changjiji was leased for 25 years to Sangay Dorji in 2001 at an annual lease rent of Nu 2 per sft and the approval for the construction of an entertainment hall was issued by Thimphu City Corporation (TCC).

In 2006, the lease was transferred from Sangay Dorji to Kunlay Wangchuk which was approved by the MoWHS minister with a revised lease rent of Nu 42 per sft. National Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) was directed by the ministry to execute the new lease agreement but Kunlay Wangchuk who said the new rates were not unacceptable, refused to sign any agreement despite several notices issued to him nor has he paid any lease rent since 2006. The current total outstanding lease rent has been calculated at more than Nu 5.2mn.

At some point of time, the MoWHS has even sought to sell the land to the current theatre owner while national council (NC) members linked the case to ‘policy corruption’ during its ninth parliamentary session last summer.

Recently the National Land Commission Dispute Settlement Committee rejected the government proposal to sell the Trowa Theater land based on the Land Act 2007 and instead lowered the lease rate based on the Tenancy Act and its own land lease rates.

Check Also

Lyonpo Karma Dorji pledges to transfer his 80% shares in an IT company implementing a Nu 81 mn Govt Tender

The appointment of the new Labour Minister Karma Dorji has brought a unique situation of …

11 comments

  1. I don’t know what our Honorable Dasho Sonam Kinga has to say now, even ACC has given a clean chit to the owners of Trowa Theater. During his protestations against the RGOB in regard to this issue, it was clear that he was linking the PM to the owners of Trowa and trying to discredit the PM.

    The people of Trashigang overwhelming supported the PM and DPT in the last elections and I don’t see anything changing this time around, however, maybe it is now time for the same people to review their position on Dasho Sonam Kinga, who in his 5 year term as a member of the National Council behaved more like he was a member of the PDP..

    • Dasho Sonam Kinga performed extraordinarily well as NC candidate. That is why His Majesty awarded him the red scarf. The people of Trashigang unanimously want him back to represent them again, there is no doubt about it. I am a Trashigangpa and will definitely vote for him and support him. Even as BBS TV panelist he shone like a star putting the other panelists of ministerial ranks to shame both in delivery as well as content. He does his homework before talking and he is courageous and performs without fear or favor. Keep up the good work Dasho Sonam Kinga.

      • Haha, good try.

      • Anyway, you seem to know all the good he did, frankly, I am not convinced, however, in regard to the above case, he did exactly what I have cited. Why don’t you ask him and find out what his motives were, wasn’t he the one who actually was the most vocal about it and was adamant that it be sent to the ACC for investigation.

        In regard to his red scarf, to award it is His Majesty’s prerogative, but you will agree with me that many people who never deserved it in the past were awarded red scarves too, a case in point is the present Speaker, I am of the view that he should have never been given a Bura Maap and I am sure we can put some more on that list.

        As far as the BBS thing you are referring to, I concede that he is a very good public speaker, at the same time, it is my opinion is that he thinks he is too good and projects that air of arrogance.

  2. Even this paper the Bhutanese and the Opposition party made lot of hue and cry on the issue. Now take back your words and bow down before the govt. One should never take things for granted.

    • laksam is always for the ruling party whether good or bad. You should have courage to accept and own responsibility if true. Frankly this govt has been weak, trying to be nice to all without much accountability. No offense to any one by the way. This is a fact. Accept sometime that you may be wrong and you will feel good or your defensiveness will turn into pus one day which is not good for you!

  3. Trowa theater case finally resolved? i think this needs further investigation…involving policy lapses are the most common and risky cases putting countrys development into vurnability of downturn.

  4. Wisdom seems to be brother of TL, because he is always for the Bhutanese

  5. Hi Landless, if u are not satisfied with ACC,s judgement u have the right to appeal to Higher ACC within 10 days. So hurry up else you will be late because election date is fast approaching.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *