Anti-Corruption Commission of Bhutan

ACC tells NC it can give view on BIMSTEC SG only after investigation

In response to the National Council asking for the ACC to validate if sections 54, 58 and 63 of the Anti Corruption Act of Bhutan 2011 (ACAB) had been violated in the government nominating Tenzin Lekphell as the next Secretary General of BIMSTEC, the ACC wrote back on 21st September that it can only form its opinion after ‘completing the due process of investigation on the matter which would take its own due course of time.’

ACC said that that the ACC, despite being mandated to take necessary step to prevent and combat corruption, does not have the legally required mandate to provide legal opinion on the possible contravention of the said provisions of the ACAB.

The ACC said that even after the investigation the opinion formed by the ACC would be further subject to scrutiny by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG). The ACC said it regrets to inform the NC Chairman that the ACC is legally constrained in providing any legal opinion.

In the meantime, the paper has learnt that based on the letter by the NC the ACC as per its practice has registered a complaint on the issue.

A compliant evaluation committee of the ACC has taken a look at the complaint and it has asked for more information to be collected.

Based on this the committee has to make a recommendation to the Commission on whether to launch a formal investigation on the case or not.

However, the fact that the complaint evaluation committee has not dismissed the case and is collecting more information is significant. The information collected is expected to be mainly desk top research and collection of documents.

The only problem at the moment is that the ACC does not have a Chairperson and Commissioner since they finished their term in July and it has only one Commissioner in place in the form of Commissioner Ngawang Pem who also signed the letter sent to the NC Chairman.

The Commission has to take the final call on whether to order an investigation or not based on the recommendation of the complaint evaluation committee.

The Commission is also the one which after the investigation decides on when to send the case to the OAG.

COVID-19 restrictions have also had an impact on ACC investigations as the movement of the staff has been reduced, and except to collect documents it cannot do extensive field investigations.

Also, as a caution, after the recent national lockdown the ACC has stopped calling people for interrogation.

The ACC is currently investigating around 30 plus cases with some cases ready to go to the OAG.

Message from The Bhutanese

Dear Reader,

                         You are reading this article for free on the website but it is almost three days after it has been published. If you want access to new stories on the day of its publication, which is early Saturday morning, in your email then subscribe to the Electronic Copy or the PDF version of the paper and stay ahead.

This paper has broken some of the biggest and impactful stories in Bhutan and strives to provide good content that is often exclusive and different from other papers.

For a year’s subscription M-BoB Nu 500 to the BoB Account Number – 100915844 with Account name – The Bhutanese.
For two years subscription send in Nu 1,000.

Then take a screenshot of the transaction and email it along with your email ID to ad.bhutanese@gmail.com .
The PDF copy of the paper will be sent to you.

Please check the email address properly when sending your screen shot. In case you do not get your PDF copy call Sonam Dema 17801081.

Despite the lockdown, The Bhutanese paper is still publishing its paper in the E-Copy format that you can get in your email.

Thank You,

The Bhutanese

Check Also

The story of Khandu Wangmo’s victims in the sedition case

While the Thimphu District Court has convicted Khandu Wangmo for sedition, for planting seditious documents …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *