Gol building in need of revamp

The Gol (round) building constructed sometime in the 50s stands as Phuentsholing’s landmark. Little children studying in India used to be hysterical when they caught a glimpse of the building while returning for vacation because then they knew they were home.

But the building which has 87 units including 21 commercial units and approximately 500 families residing in it does not have scientific or seismic elements incorporated in its design.

Moreover, water is already seeping into its walls and cracks have developed. Also plants have started growing on it. Currently, the National Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) is still in the process of assessing the building but a recent visit by its engineers reportedly revealed that the building seems to be standing strong.

According to the Real Estate General Manager of the NHDC, Dechen Wangdi, earlier due to budget constraints, water and drainage problems among others were constant issues. However, the Phuentsholing Dungkhag has taken care of the minor hitches like wiring, pipeline and some leakages; the major ones will be handled by the NHDC.

It has been over three months that the building has been handed over to the NHDC; earlier, the building was under the care of the Phuentsholing Dungkhag.

However, Dechen Wangdi said that the Gol building is much stronger than most of the structures that have been built in Phuentsholing prior to the year 2000.

Some were government-owned quarters but most were private buildings.

Dechen Wangdi said that to design structures to make them earthquake-resistant was a costly affair.

One example he cited was the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) building in Thimphu, which after assessment was to be seismically designed; however, the costs exceeded 80% of the original amount allotted.

Therefore the plan was dismissed and UNDP is said to be going in for a new construction for its office.

Phuentsholing Mayor Tshiteem Dorji, said the building owners have been informed that houses that had been built before 1999 should go for retrofitting and reinforcement of pillars for earthquake resistance but none have approached the municipality so far.

“Going for such renovations are expensive, a better alternative would be to dismantle the structure and rebuild it with the necessary arrangements,” said the Mayor, who added that it was the people’s safety that concerned them the most.

Dechen Wangdi added that in Thimphu alone, there were about 300 buildings that were not seismically protected and safe.

Check Also

Disadvantaged youths excluded from College opportunities due to lack of marks and money

There are many questions about the future of youths who pass out from class 12 …


  1. Samden Drup Matsug

    Our people are always concern on cost escalation. If we do it what is required and safe for the people to live invest and relax for at 20 years without or with minor maintenance. It will cover the cost of construction with such mechanism. Always costly, always costly, what is this. Feed up with our planner and policy makers. They would love to repair and do maintenance one year after the construction is completed. Such maintenance will exceed the cost of initial construction cost by many folds. So think 30-100 years down the line. For instance building apartments in Europe and other developed countries are built in 18th century and still stands majestically with the modern concrete buildings. That means they have invested heavy cost initially.

  2. Sooner the better! Knock it down for goodness…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *