Kerala Court to request Bhutanese Court for information on Bhutan Lottery Scam

This is to be done through a ‘Letter Rogatory’ issued through diplomatic channels from the Kerala High Court to a Court in Bhutan

In an exclusive interview the CBI Superintendent K. Krishnakumar investigating the Bhutan Lottery scam in India said that the CBI has requested the Kerala High Court to issue a ‘Letter Rogatory’ or ‘Request for information’ from Bhutan on the lottery scam.

The ‘Letter Rogatory’ is an international practice of the court of one country requesting information from a foreign court, is expected to reach Bhutan by this month through diplomatic channels.

Under this letter a competent Bhutanese court will summon all relevant documents and individuals connected to Bhutan Lottery and gather the information requested in the Letter Rogatory. The testimonies given by the Bhutanese officials will be given as sworn testimony to be used in the Kerala High Court.

This will be a significant move as so far Bhutanese lottery officials have not yet been questioned on the multi-billion Bhutan Lottery scam.

“The letter will ask for information on all aspects of the lottery cases with respect to the Bhutanese government. These will include specific and relevant question related to the lottery in Bhutan and also request for lottery documents,” said CBI’s Cochin unit superintendent K. Krishnakumar.

He said that once the letter came to Bhutan the letter would be treated as per the laws of Bhutan and also on the bilateral understanding between the two countries.

The documents asked for would include agreement copies, the RAA Audit report on Bhutan Lottery and other documents related to lottery operations in Bhutan.

In response to a question on what if Bhutanese officials did not cooperate the CBI officer said, “First, we are expecting that the Bhutanese officials will cooperate. If the response is negative then we will take action at various levels, if there is a need.”

He, however, made it clear that Bhutan was a sovereign country and so the CBI cannot question or directly investigate any Bhutanese official based in Bhutan.

Superintendent K. Krishnakumar, however, stressed that the cooperation of Bhutanese officials would be crucial as the most important aspect in the investigation of the Bhutan lottery cases.

In response to a question on what if the Kerala court found some Bhutanese officials guilty he said, “We can only inform and recommend action through diplomatic channels and it will be up to the Bhutanese government.”

He said that a Letter Rogatory was only asked for after detailed consultations in India. The Union Home Ministry of India had given the CBI the green light to file for such a letter with the Kerala High Court which had asked for the CBI investigation in the first place.

The Indian Ambassador in Thimphu, Pavan K. Varma said, “Once I receive the Letter Rogatory we will deliver it to the Foreign Ministry in Bhutan for implementation.”

The Ambassador said that the Foreign Ministry, then only, would hand over the letter to a court in Bhutan.

Currently Bhutan and India have an extradition treaty and are signatories to a Mutual Assistance for Criminal Matters, Suppression of Terrorism for sharing information on terrorism, etc.

However, the Attorney General Phuntsho Wangdi said that both countries do not have a functioning Mutual Legal Assistance Convention as the SAARC Mutual Legal Assistance Convention is yet to be ratified by some member countries.

An official from the Foreign Ministry said that they receive requests from Indian courts for information through diplomatic channels on mainly cross border cases but this was the first formal Letter Rogatory of its type.

“When we receive such requests for information it is treated on a case by case basis. Once we receive such a request we will seek advice of the OAG to see in what court this letter must be issued,” said the official.

Internationally Bhutan is neither a member of the Hague Evidence Convention or the Hague Service Convention on sharing evidences and information between courts without having to go through diplomatic channels.

According to a legal expert the response of the Bhutan government to the Letter Rogatory will ordinarily be based on bilateral understanding and cooperation and also reciprocity. The legal expert said that the decision ultimately with lie with the government on the extent of the cooperation and the court would only follow from there.

However, in the past the Ministry of Finance has already shared information with India through diplomatic channels on the lottery scam.

The legal expert said that since it was a High Court that had sent the request the appropriate authority would be the High Court in Bhutan.

The finance secretary Lam Dorji said, “We will have to wait and see. The lottery office was closed in 2011 but we have shared some information in the past.”

The Bhutan Lottery scam was first brought to light by the Media in 2010.

Later a special RAA report on the Bhutan lottery operations confirmed many of the media reports on the Bhutan Lottery scam.

The report confirmed irregularities in the operation of Bhutan Lottery worth Nu 263.6bn a year in 2007 alone, printing in illegal presses, billions in potential revenue lost by Bhutan, reduction of annual fee from 470 mn to 220 mn on false grounds, non printing of prize money, changing the lottery agreement illegally by the current government to favor Martin and other illegalities.

The report also pointed out cases of unauthorized payments to Bhutan lottery directorate staff, illegal transfer of company ownership, under-reporting of actual value of Bhutan lottery by lottery officials etc.

The audit report was however not shared with anyone except the Prime Minister, Finance Minister and the Finance Secretary.

ACC was not provided with a copy and copies were denied to the National Council and opposition party among others.

Minjur Dorji  & Puran Gurung

Check Also

A Squid Game for Passports

On 22 October 2022 the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) announced that around 60,000 passports …


  1. For the sake of justice we hope the High Court will uphold the law and provide correct information to India. Our High Court does not have good reputation in India. Almost 20 years ago a Bhutanese business man was arrested in Calcutta on smuggling charges. The Bhutanese man was released on bail on medical ground. The man came to Bhutan for treatment from Calcutta. Dr. Pemba the then chief surgeon of Thimphu General Hospital issued dead certificate claiming the man died. The High Court endorsed the dead certificate. The Indian authorities in Calcutta were informed the man died. Some sources said that the Indian Embassy in Thimphu directly informed the King that the man pronounced dead by the High Court is alive. It caused huge embarrassment to Bhutan. The contract of Dr. Pemba was not renewed and he left for Darjeeling. Some say that Dr. Pemba commented: “I must have given the certificate because someone higher up asked me to give it”. Someone higher up was believed to be the then Chief Justice. The High Court should not disgrace Bhutan.

  2. All those found guilty should be brought to justice. MoF should be interrogated thoroughly.

  3. Haha, and yet again. I already see the reaction from OAG if MOFA sought advice from them.

  4. Bhutan lottery scam was matter of discussion for many times….media reported many cases on it..yet many people were not convinced with why our present government did not issue a copy of audit report with neither NC nor ACC.
    1. can it be because they found some officials guilty and corrupt?
    2. is it restricted by the law?
    3. or does it mean that present government want to function as autrocrat?????

    • For God sake please don’t request the Court , it is futile.As long as the present Govt. rules they don’t accept their weaknesses/negatives. They will again engage OAG to defend against them.The case will be national failure as mentioned by Sonoma.

  5. I don’t know if legal option is applicable because i don’t know the truth. But i definitely want to know what administrative actions have been taken…

  6. The common man

    Our OAG will say, there is no legality in this case. It is baseless… we already know it they say we case by case…
    They are already proving gyelposhing case as baseless…. well all know the truth.

  7. I hope the government  does not bungle up this case . If it does, then the implications could have far reaching and dangerous repercussions for Bhutan.  

  8. It came as fame with country’s name to give the tag of shame….but whom to blame?

  9. why take the advice of OGA. Since he has already proven.

  10. Here i will not talk about other lottery. What about YDF lottery that is not drawn yet. there is no mention of returning money. I am still preserving it because they knowing sold when order was issued not to…

    I want to know what action has been taken against that because I lost Nu. 300 but how 300S would have robbed from others like me?

  11. to me what ever is happning, there is a hand of present Chief Justice. He is all over but he knows how to play behind the stage. Please be awear of him. This man can show his innocents physically but he is so dangerous.

  12. system is corrupt and closure of bhutan lottery was done so quickly to avoid what was going to take place-CBI inquiry.The corrupt guys saw it coming and they immediatedly closed the Bhutan lottery.
    political parties should take note of this.,

  13. On serious note, Bhutan as an independent country should think twice before we comply to Indian Court. We should make sure that our independence is not compromised by following Indian Court’s order.

    Meanwhile, please take action against them. Somebody should file petition to supreme court and see what direction it can give to government…

    • It is not of matter of compromising of independence but it is matter of truth and justice. Any citizens who had crossed the boundary of truth and justice they have to face the justice. No country will support for injustice and corruption.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *